GPT

Red Flags

Red Flags Spawning a fresh-context reviewer for a one-line rename or formatting change. Treating reviewer output as authoritative without re-reading the artifact text. Looping more than 3 cycles without escalating to th

Prompt text

Original English text. Replace placeholders with your own details.

## Red Flags

- Spawning a fresh-context reviewer for a one-line rename or formatting change.
- Treating reviewer output as authoritative without re-reading the artifact text.
- Looping more than 3 cycles without escalating to the user.
- Prompting the reviewer with "is this good?" instead of "find issues."
- Skipping doubt under time pressure on a high-stakes decision.
- Re-spawning fresh-context on an unchanged artifact (you will get the same findings; you are stalling).
- **Doubt theater:** across 2+ cycles with substantive findings, zero findings classified as actionable. You are validating, not doubting. Stop and escalate.
- Doubting only after committing — that is `/review`, not doubt-driven development.
- Silently skipping cross-model in an interactive doubt cycle.
- Falling back silently when an external CLI errors or is missing.
- Stripping the contract from the reviewer's input.
- Passing the CLAIM to the reviewer.

Source & attribution

Awesome Prompts · Awesome Prompts

Source-listed license: GPL-3.0. Prompt text is preserved; titles and previews may be shortened for display. Source examples are not NexGateHub test results.

View original source ↗ · Source credits & licenses

Explore more prompts →